Group A

Subject: We need immigration laws in Apollon

Moderator: Tama Homer

Supporters: Angelina Miller

                    Mac Jason

                   

Oppositions: Laura Addy

                     Belle Waterfall

                     Jack Bauer

Opinions of supporters:

・ Angelina

     → We can improve our hospitability by accepting immigrants.

・ Mac

     → Now, we don’t have enough young people. And inviting immigrants is only way to develop Apollon.

Opinions of oppositions:

・ Laura

     → If we invite immigrants, the crimes will be increase because of the differences of culture.

・ Belle

     → She was concerned about immigrants’ political rights, their work place, and losing our unique culture.

・ Jack

     → If we invite immigrants, we have to build high buildings. But, they make the scenery worse. And some immigrants may lose their job, and become homeless.

Conclusion: ???

This discussion was difficult for me. Because, I can’t understand what the immigration laws regulate. If you want not to accept immigrants, you should make a law that regulates that we don't accept immigrants. So I can’t understand why oppositions think that we don’t need laws.

Group B

Subject: Should we develop our countryside?

Moderator: Hanna Marin

Supporters: Allie Collins

                    Lucus Arden

                    Finnian Lee

Oppositions: Carol Smith

                     Kofy Keita

Opinions of supporters:

・ Allie

     → If we develop our countryside, Apollon will be more famous.

・ Lucus

     → Now, most people live in the city. Because of that, some problems happen, such as air pollution. But if we disperse people to country side, the problems will be solved. So we should develop our country to disperse.

・ Finnian

     → It is good for young people to develop our countryside. And we should make tourist resort.

Opinions of oppositions:

・ Carol

     → If we develop our countryside, our nature will be lost. We should protect it.

・ Kofy

     → Countryside is the place where I can be concentrated. I'm a writer, so it is an important place. And we shouldn't develop our countryside to protect nature and for children.

Conclusion: We should develop our countryside with protecting nature.

I think supporters discussed about "how should we do to develop our country" more than the subject. So if they discuss about the subject more, their discussion will be better.

And it seems to be so difficult to answer the question to ask the place of countryside.

Group C

Subject: Should we use a solar energy instead of a nuclear energy?


Moderator: Isabela Horan

Supporters: Ashley Turner
                    Lucy Walter
                    Sara Cooper

Oppositions: Sophie Dawson
                     Emily Thoma



Opinions of supporters:


・ In the long view, it saves much money to use a solar energy. But, using a nuclear energy needs  much money to maintain.

・ Nuclear system is dangerous.


Opinions of oppositions:


・ We have to kill nature for the space to install solar panel.
　　　→ Supporters: If we use the space that install nuclear system now, we don't have to kill nature.



Conclusion: We try to reduce the nuclear energy until finding a better system.



I think Isabera did good job. I can understand panelists' opinions easily because she formed their opinions.